AI in hiring deserves scrutiny - discrimination risk is real, and hand-waving isn't an answer. Here is exactly how Lemonade's screening is built to be fairer than the process it replaces.
Every candidate for a role is screened against the same brief - the role's actual requirements, checked one by one against the same criteria - which decades of hiring research shows is more consistent and less biased than unstructured CV sifting.
Every score in every screening report links to the evidence behind it - what's actually in the candidate's record and application. Nothing is a black-box rating, and gaps are flagged honestly rather than hidden.
Lem does the legwork - sourcing, screening, the paperwork. Every verdict is shown with its reasoning, and no candidate is rejected by an algorithm: Lem recommends, the employer decides, and every candidate can reply to Lem and ask for a second look.
Screening is competency-based: your role's actual requirements, checked one by one, the same way for every candidate, with the evidence shown. Nothing about a person that is not a requirement of the role is scored.
UK GDPR compliant, ICO registered (ZC092497). Candidates are never shared without consent - nobody appears on a shortlist without saying yes to the role - and candidate data is never sold.
Questions about any of this? Ask us before you post a role - we'd rather you were sure. See also our Privacy Policy.